Are Reciprocal Links Worth Anything at All?
Posted on May 11th, 2007 in Link Building | No Comments »
A lot has been, and is still being, said about reciprocal linking - that you should do it, shouldn’t do it, it’ll kill your site, rob your family, give you cancer, make you rich and so many other rubbish absolutisms.
The reality is that reciprocal linking is the same as any other form of linking - it works or it doesn’t depending on what site is linking to you, where they’re linking from and how the link is placed within the context of the particular page it’s on.
And you can forget PR (page rank) right now. Just forget it. OK, I admit that’s impossible. But at least you can try to ignore it a bit. PR is not the important factor in whether or not you should ask for or accept a link exchange with another site.
I have been doing link building since long, long before SEO even had a name much less an anacranym and link building as a term hasn’t yet been coined. And I know for a fact that some reciprocal link building yields traffic and even sales (or sign ups, downloads, whatever the desired action might be) but they have to be the right reciprocal links.
So which reciprocal links are worthwhile?
- Links on extremely relevant sites/pages. Links for a casino site on a Stanford university student’s page is not relevant.
- Links that are placed so as to be noticeable - links and resource pages are fine provided your link isn’t buried amidst 50 other links. If it’s 1 of 10 and they are all totally on topic you’re in for some good click throughs.
- Button links, banner links, well worded text links, links that stand out in some way and scream “Click ME”. (Note that they have to be static, html links, not plagued by nofollow, rotating banners or tracked by javascript else search engines can’t credit them as a link to your site.)
- Links that are accompanied by relevant text such as a full description of your site or better yet the site owner uses your link within his page text as a noteworthy place to get more relevant information from and so on.
- Links that are the cited as THE information source for something or other: “For more information on blue alligators visit the blue alligator site”. It doesn’t really matter what it is so long as your site actually has that information and it is the one cited as the chosen reference.
Technical things to watch out for when exchanging links include:
- nofollow tags in either the header code or the actual link code itself
- javascript redirects which can take quite a few forms
- other forms of redirected links
- links being placed on a page that is listed in the site’s robots.txt as Disallow - meaning search engines are banned from spidering that page
- links on pages that are buried inside a frame or iframe - both of which are accessible to search engines but more difficult for them to get to than a standard page
- flash links - again, Google can index them but you can’t be sure it will
If you are in doubt simply ask politely for a good old fashioned static html link. If they ask you what you mean send them the list above stating that those are what you don’t want.
You are after traffic but you also need the search engines to index the link to your site and credit it to your site’s link popularity. Why shouldn’t you have the best of both worlds?
Happy link building!